Industrial Security Clearance Decisions. These 1,2. 04 decisions pertain to the adjudication of security clearance. Do. D Directive 5. Executive Order 1. Financial. 12/3. 1/2. Applicant has not mitigated the security concerns caused by her financial situation. Applicant has failed to rebut or mitigate the security concerns under Guideline F, financial considerations. Item Description DoD Instructions DoDI 4140.01: DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Policy Requires unique item level traceability for all DoD serially managed items that are also sensitive or pilferable, all DoD serially managed CSI, all NWRM, depot level. Two of Applicant’s debts were duplicated on the SOR, which left Applicant with nine validated delinquent debts. He has resolved four of his delinquent debts, totaling $1. However, Applicant failed to produce sufficient evidence that five debts totaling $1. He has not fully mitigated the Financial Considerations security concerns. Eligibility for access to classified information is denied. Although she recently paid or otherwise resolved several past- due debts, she did so only after receiving the SOR and despite having the resources to start addressing her debts at least a year earlier. Significant doubts remain about Applicant's judgment and reliability. Applicant completed her probation in 2. She also completed 1. USAJOBS is the Federal Government's official one-stop source for Federal jobs and employment information. DARPA Webinar, 5-4-11 chart 2 What is DoD Acquisition?
She has no other criminal record. Due to the recency of the conviction, she has not mitigated the criminal conduct security concern. Applicant has not mitigated the security concerns under the personal conduct guideline despite an exemplary work record of more than 2. She engaged in an elaborate, fraudulent plan to help a friend obtain employment in her agency based on a false address for residency preference. She drafted a false lease to solidify the plan. As treasurer of a professional association, Applicant used her position to access the account for personal use. She did not disclose her actions until an investigation occurred in or about 2. Eligibility for a security clearance is denied. He failed to provide sufficient documentation of progress resolving this debt. Financial considerations concerns are not mitigated. Eligibility for access to classified information is denied. She radically changed her spending habits, submitted documentary proof of a consistent track record of debt repayment, and reduced the total amount of outstanding debt by half. Her financial situation no longer casts doubt on her current reliability, trustworthiness, and good judgment. He used illegal drugs from 1. He used illegal drugs while holding a security clearance. He has been diagnosed with drug dependency and alcohol abuse. He has numerous delinquent debts that are not paid or resolved. He deliberately falsified security clearance applications, and provided false information to government investigators. Applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns under Guidelines E, personal conduct, F, financial considerations, G, alcohol consumption, and H, drug involvement. He had two work infractions in 2. He had five delinquent debts. He resolved three small debts, but has not resolved the two large debts. Applicant mitigated the security concerns under Guideline E, personal conduct, but failed to mitigate the security concerns under Guideline F, financial considerations. He intentionally failed to disclose derogatory information on his security clearance application and during his background interview. He failed to mitigate personal conduct security concerns. He discharged over $2. The evidence is insufficient to mitigate resulting security concerns. Eligibility for access to classified information is denied. She has numerous delinquent debts that are unpaid or unresolved. Applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns under Guideline F, financial considerations. To date, he has made some progress in addressing his debts through completed payment plans, but has maintained no sustained track record, and no meaningful income sources to meet his repayment obligations in the foreseeable future. While many of his debts can be attributed to extenuating circumstances associated with the lack of gainful employment, his efforts to date in addressing his debts are not sufficient to enable him to meet his mitigation burden. He failed to mitigate the criminal conduct and sexual behavior security concerns arising from his arrest and subsequent conviction. He also did not mitigate the concerns stemming from his troubled finances. She has frequent contact with her parents. Applicant’s father- in- law was a high- level Pakistan Government official. He turned in his Pakistani National Identity Card (NIC) to his employer. Although foreign preference concerns are mitigated, foreign influence security concerns are not mitigated. Eligibility for access to classified information is denied. He presented sufficient evidence to mitigate the security concerns arising under Guideline F, Financial Considerations. Eligibility for access to classification information is granted. In November 2. 00. Between March 2. 01. November 2. 01. 2, he incurred 1. Based on his meaningful track record of payments of almost all of the delinquent accounts, Applicant has mitigated the security concerns related to financial considerations. Eligibility for access to classified information is granted. At this time all SOR- listed debts remain unpaid or unresolved. He failed to demonstrate that he is reliable in addressing his financial delinquencies. Resulting security concerns were not mitigated. Based upon a review of the pleadings and exhibits, eligibility for access to classified information is denied. In May 1. 99. 5 and December 2. Bankruptcy Court discharged her nonpriority, unsecured debts under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Circumstances largely beyond her control caused her recent delinquent debt. She made substantial progress resolving her financial problems and less than $3,0. Financial considerations concerns are mitigated. Eligibility for access to classified information is granted. Adverse decision affirmed. When the real estate market crashed, Applicant was unable to rent them, make the loan payments, or sell the properties. Nine properties were foreclosed, and some mortgage loans remain delinquent. Applicant engaged in risky behavior that left him unable to meet his financial obligations, and did not show reliability and good judgment. The evidence is insufficient to mitigate resulting security concerns. Based upon a review of the pleadings, testimony, and exhibits, eligibility for access to classified information is denied. Applicant has a masters. American university. Applicant has not demonstrated that he was denied due. Adverse decision affirmed. He does not know if the property has undergone foreclosure, and he has been unable to ascertain the status of the past- due mortgage debts. He stated that he will resolve the credit card debts after he resolves his mortgage indebtedness. Applicant’s personal financial statement showed sufficient monthly remainders that could be used to resolve some of his debts. He failed to mitigate security concerns under the financial considerations adjudicative guideline. Eligibility for a security clearance is denied. He has not paid off most of his significant overdue debts, nor does it appear that he made a responsible attempt to resolve the debts in question for many years. Mitigation has not been shown. Eligibility for access to classified information is granted. Two of the arrests were alcohol- related. The most recent arrest occurred after he completed his security clearance application. Under these circumstances, it is too soon to conclude Applicant has mitigated the alcohol consumption and criminal conduct security concerns. The Statement of Reasons alleges delinquent loans amounting to more than $2. She has made sporadic payments between 2. She failed to follow through on a promise to establish payment plans in the past. She established two monthly payment plans shortly before the hearing. She filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition two weeks after the hearing. Her history does not show commitment to resolving her financial delinquencies. Applicant's request for a security clearance is denied. Applicant has acted responsibly by attempting to resolve this debt. Mitigation has been shown. He demonstrated a meaningful track record of debt reduction and elimination by paying off several SOR and non- SOR accounts, and by entering repayment agreements with other creditors. There are clear indications that his financial problems are being resolved and are under control. In addition, he routinely consumed alcohol to excess. He attended several alcohol programs, and, after some slips, which he referred to as relapses, he finally acknowledged that he did not get it right the first time when he continued to consume alcohol. Applicant admits that he has a drinking problem, and considers himself to be an alcoholic. He has vowed not to consume alcohol in the future. Applicant successfully completed outpatient counseling and has voluntarily entered the aftercare program. With a current sobriety date of April 1. Applicant’s actions under the circumstances no longer raise questions about his reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified information. Due to circumstances beyond his control, he had insufficient financial resources to pay his debts. Utilizing his retirement savings, he settled and paid six SOR debts, totaling $8. SOR debts totaling $3. Financial considerations concerns are mitigated. Eligibility for access to classified information is granted. Applicant has failed to rebut or mitigate the security concerns under Guideline F, financial considerations. He received a military pension from the Pakistani government. He moved from Pakistan in 1. Security concerns under Guideline C are mitigated. However, Applicant has ties to family members who are Pakistani citizens and residents. His father served in the Pakistani military before retiring. Applicant maintains contact with his father and other foreign family members. Security concerns under Guideline B and are not mitigated. The evidence shows he has strong and long- standing family and employment ties to the United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |